Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 5,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
For one thing, we do not see how it matters whether a request for judicial notice aids the plaintiffs or the defense. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
When courts focus on the state’s interest in equal protection cases, what differentiates rational basis review from intermediate-level scrutiny or strict scrutiny, as a formal doctrinal matter, is that the latter two standards require, respectively, an “important” or “compelling” state interest. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:50 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:29 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:18 am
Ben Miller and Robert D. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The Court had previously ruled that obscene materials, as defined under Miller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:57 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Joe Miller: Yeah. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Mount v Hodder & Staughton Limited, 16 January 2014 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
The loudest voice on surveillance matters was, of course, President Obama’s. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
I would never be one to say that law schools get everything right when it comes to pedagogical matters, but blind grading is one area where I think that others could learn from our example. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:09 am
As highlighted in a recent discovery ruling in a trade secrets lawsuit between Miller U.K. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:09 am
As highlighted in a recent discovery ruling in a trade secrets lawsuit between Miller U.K. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
Is thereno 'justice' in judicata, Mr Miller QC? [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:12 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Department of the Treasury; Steven Miller, in his capacity as the Acting Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service; and their respective agencies (DHHS, Treasury and IRS). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
Both Lerner and Miller received significant bonuses for their employment. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:04 am
Perhaps because my political sensibility is not terribly far from Litt’s (though I’m certainly not a partisan Democrat) I was a little taken aback by that sentence.Why is there any contradiction between being a liberal on social issues—or, for that matter, on matters of economic policy—and believing in strong signals intelligence programs? [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:47 pm
She stated that under Miller v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:25 am
In A-Rod’s case, it’s hard to see that the arbitrator made such a big mistakes in such a heavily arbitrated matter. [read post]
