Search for: "No Named Defendant"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 57,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this medical malpractice case and its proceedings.) [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:41 pm
(The vendors are not named as defendants in the cases.) [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:45 am
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:44 am
A couple from New Jersey, that was hit by a car in 2009 in while they rode their motorcycle are now suing a woman, who repeatedly text messaged her boyfriend as drove his vehicle to work, for her part in her at-fault boyfriend's motorcycle-car accident. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 5:15 pm
Star went on to praise the recent creation of a free legal clinic for student innovators advised by Boston University professors, while also suggesting further policy changes that MIT could make “to value the culture that its name stands for. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 5:26 pm
Still others are homeowners, apartment managers, and leaseholders—whoever’s name is on the ISP bill. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
Defendants have not yet answered plaintiff’s complaint. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:03 pm
§ 29-26-121(a)(1) merely says that it must be given “to each health care provider that will be a named defendant. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 1:49 pm
The Decision The Ohio Supreme Court ultimately agreed with PartsSource, holding that, when a case originates with a single named plaintiff and that plaintiff is not subject to an arbitration agreement that was agreed to by unnamed putative class members, the defendant need not raise a specific argument relating to arbitration in the defendant’s answer. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
(Please also note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this personal injury lawsuit and its proceedings.) [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Search warrant for defendant’s house and person authorized the search of his person when he was stopped in his car away from the house. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
” Looking at the “whole impression” of the defendant’s statements, Judge Dillard said a jury could conclude from both the defendant’s deposition and affidavit he was telling the same story—namely, that “he began moving toward [the plaintiff’s] lane; that when he did so, he felt a vibration; and that, upon feeling an impact, he moved or straightened his vehicle ‘back’ in his lane of travel. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:59 am
The crash occurred on June 25, 2010, and the plaintiff filed his complaint on June 20, 2011, naming the deceased defendant husband and the defendant wife. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
This case was before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
RCC’s OppositionsGenericnessA mark is generic if it “is the common descriptive name of a class of goods or services” (H. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:59 pm
The Martin Ennals Award, named for the first secretary-general of Amnesty International, is a collaboration of ten of the world’s leading human rights organizations, including AI. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:45 pm
According to the Mecklenburg County version, the defendant takes on a new name, and declares that he cannot be prosecuted for any crimes which occurred under his prior name. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:43 pm
A few weeks ago, defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration of Nathan Surrett and Jennifer Adams’ claims and to stay or dismiss the case. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
Defendant could argue that “To don” is a commonly-used verb, that “Henley” is a generic name for a particular style of tee-shirt, and that, as such, Plaintiff should not be allowed to prevent Defendant to use them in combination. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:05 am
§1441(b) where the in-state defendant was properly served with the original complaint that didn't name the removing defendants, but not with the amended complaint that did name those defendants. [read post]
