Search for: "O’Connor Law"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 3,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
At the time there were rumors that Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor might be leaving the High Court, for her husband was suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
Vanda argues that the law of obviousness requires more than simply a reasonable expectation of success. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
No: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices O’ Donnell and O’Neill Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2307.96 Asbestos Claim—Multiple Defendants—Substantial Factor Test (If a plaintiff in a tort action alleges any injury or loss resulting from exposure to asbestos as a result of the tortious acts of one or more defendants, in order to maintain a cause of action against any of the defendants the plaintiff must… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm
It’s high time the voices of family law professionals gave way to their victims. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor,* Justices French,** Fischer,*** and former Justice DeGenaro** (all would accept on Proposition I) *Would accept the appeal on all propositions of law. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
Here, under the rape shield law, there’s no limiting language. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Annual Discovery & E-Discovery Conference (Law Bulletin Seminars) June 8, 2011 Chicago, IL Click here for more information. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
A concurring opinion by Chief Justice Moyer and Justice O’Connor argued that an insurer’s defense obligation was not assignable, particularly where, as here, multiple parties might be seeking a defense such that the assignment had materially changed or increased the risk faced by the insurer. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:47 am
In Texas, we have the Jones McClure publications (featuring the famous “O’Connors Causes of Action”). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
That’s one approach. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
Brennan had secretly assisted law professor Bernard Schwartz on his biography of Earl Warren, Super Chief. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The question was whether this exclusion was compatible with Convention rights and if not, whether a remedy could be provided.While O’Connor v Wiltshire County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 426 appeared to be on a similar point on the 1973 Act, it had in fact been decided in that case that the highway had been adopted within the relevant period, so there was no authority on the point.The road was built by a developer as part of a housing development that started in 1999. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The question was whether this exclusion was compatible with Convention rights and if not, whether a remedy could be provided.While O’Connor v Wiltshire County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 426 appeared to be on a similar point on the 1973 Act, it had in fact been decided in that case that the highway had been adopted within the relevant period, so there was no authority on the point.The road was built by a developer as part of a housing development that started in 1999. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
In its opinion below, the Court of Appeals had held that the can’s coming into the defendant’s possession violated the Fourth Amendment because “[a]ll individuals have a legitimate expectation of privacy that objects coming into their rightful ownership do not have electronic devices attached to them, devices that would give law enforcement agents the opportunity to monitor the location of the objects at all times and in every place that the objects are… [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Civil process may be employed in a common law criminal contempt prosecution, as was the case in United Nurses. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:28 pm
In the following guest post, Elan Kandal, a Member at the Cozen O’Connor law firm, and Neil Lipuma, Senior Vice President, Underwriting Leader—Financial Services of Hiscox USA take a look at the controversies surrounding the SEC’s use of its administrative tribunals and examines the recent court challenges to the agency’s practices. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
Justice O’Connor's opinion held that to shift the burden of persuasion to the employer, the employee must present “direct evidence that an illegitimate criterion was a substantial factor in the [employment] decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:28 am
Lara Seligman, Paul McLeary, and Connor O’Brien report for POLITICO. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice Kennedy joined the majority opinion in full. [read post]
