Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 19,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2016, 2:35 pm
For most people, that means their kid. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
For example, "flashing" people at a bar who want you to flash them. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
For those people, you can be admitted to the SDCA as long as they're (1) admitted to any other state bar (easy), (2) representing the United States (check), and -- here's the tougher part -- (3) "provided that the attorney shall apply for and pass the next succeeding California bar examination for which the attorney may be eligible after receiving permission to practice before this court and thereafter obtain admission to the State Bar of California. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 11:30 am
But it suggests an interesting question: Given the very high transaction costs of constitutional amendment under Article V, which (inevitably sticky) default rule makes the most sense? [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Strasbourg jurisprudence on precariousness generally refers to people who know at the time they start their family life, that it may not be able to continue in the host country. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
Nieves, 609 F.2d 642, 645 (2d Cir. 1979) ("It long has been established that routine border searches, conducted for the purpose of controlling the movement of people and goods across our national boundaries, do not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:52 pm
Perdue lawsuit and HB-908.Whitaker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
There also were decisions regarding the violation of the protective order in the long-running Apple v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:32 am
We are busy building tools that will automate as much of that process as we possibly can, because it is crazy having people doing this stuff manually . . . [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 5:01 am
Kerik (2d Cir. 2004) and People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
I’d be very interested to hear other people’s views/experiences. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
Clark County School Dist., supra (quoting Long v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:06 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
Milwaukee residents have long thought they were targeted for their race. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court decided in NAACP v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 5:01 am
In Waltner v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:06 pm
In People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:30 pm
But they were a bit of a scandal in their own time; not the sort of thing that nice people admitted to reading, or liking.We've come a long way. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm
Thomas and Justice Amy Coney Barrett highlighted the abuse-of-discretion standard in People v. [read post]
