Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 3061 - 3080 of 72,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2014, 6:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Still working on a long post on Garcia v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:59 pm
It was a horrendous deal, and the company was clearly preying on people who didn't know how to read very well. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:33 am by admin
Matter of Peoples v Bideau 2011 NY Slip Op 05073 Decided on June 7, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department upheld the family court’s award of custody to mother. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:41 am
A group of all star lawyers and judges will re-enact People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
But for most (regular) people, not so much.Justice Willhite writes a nice, short, well-written, and entirely correct opinion. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:09 pm
"From the WaPo article (by Robert Barnes):In 1969, the Supreme Court famously held in Tinker v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:28 am by Raffaela Wakeman
  The latter, a Chinese national, allegedly works for the People’s Republic of China—but has not yet been located. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:02 am by Deepak Gupta
“Sometimes it’s easy to forget that Supreme Court matters to average people, to our neighbors and our kids. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State Justice… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Most people assumed yes, but the Supreme Court said no in 1976 in Washington v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:40 am by Ted Frank
A remarkable settlement notice of a FACTA class action is unlikely to draw any objectors: the class consists of people who used a credit card at an AMC theater in a eight-week window in 2006-07 and got back a receipt that revealed too many credit-card digits, so unless you save four-year-old credit card receipts or have a very good memory, you're unlikely to be eligible to object. [read post]