Search for: "Persons v. Jones"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 3,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm
[Tr. 142]; [Tr. 155 (Jones testified that intravenous therapy was established at 3:35 p.m.)]; [Exhibit 7]. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
Academic David Rolph, University of Sydney Faculty of Law, has published “Publication, Innocent Dissemination and the Internet after Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick” ([2010] 33 University of New South Wales Law Journal 562). [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 1:29 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Stephanie Tubbs Jones (Case Law, ’74), D-Ohio, served as Chairwoman of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct when this revision was written. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:09 am
Greg's practice involved a lot of appearances at the Supreme Court, the most recent of which was on October 13 when he argued on behalf of a Texas district attorney in a DNA evidence case in Skinner v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm
The D.C. ruling (in a case then titled Maynard v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In Hashi v Birmingham CC, reported in this month's Legal Action, James Stark, to whom we are grateful for the transcript, has succeeded before HHJ Oliver Jones QC in the Birmingham County Court, in arguing that Birmingham failed to take account of the significance of an HHSRS assessment in the context of the definition of homelessness. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In Hashi v Birmingham CC, reported in this month's Legal Action, James Stark, to whom we are grateful for the transcript, has succeeded before HHJ Oliver Jones QC in the Birmingham County Court, in arguing that Birmingham failed to take account of the significance of an HHSRS assessment in the context of the definition of homelessness. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
The D.C. ruling (in a case then titled Maynard v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:11 pm
CAAF today issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:25 am
Jones. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am
Wilkins-Jones v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:03 am
Since the initial report of the lawsuit, Above the Law has published a supplemental post about the other side of the story, i.e. that Nelson had personal issues at work, and that some of the attorneys mentioned in the complaint would not likely have engaged in the alleged behavior.But I know some of you will read the allegations regarding the day-to-day experience of working with difficult attorneys, and completely identify with the same kind of childish and/or unacceptable behaviors Nelson… [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:21 am
In Fiorentino v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:21 am
In Fiorentino v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
State, Baldwin v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am
The D&O Diary welcomes guest submissions from responsible persons on differnent points of view. [read post]
