Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 3061 - 3080 of 55,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 9:43 pm by Howard Wasserman
Peterson, rejecting, 6-2, a challenge to a federal statute under the separation of powers principles of U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:56 am by First Mondays
 Hawaii, as well as the fascinating separation-of-powers dispute, Lucia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such procedure. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 771 The appeal considered whether the Secretary of State’s failure to exercise his power to require that abortion services be provided through the NHS in England – to women ordinarily resident in Northern Ireland – was unlawful. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:53 am
  The issue is whether CO2 is "subject to regulation" as a result of the Supreme Court's holding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Crouch, Due Process and Separating Powers within an Agency. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 7:21 am by Burton A. Padove
It means that all power, privilege, immunity, duty and obligation to that child by the parent is totally gone. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:21 am by Ron Coleman
But at least it compensated Bentley Clothing and its lawyers for having to extend themselves in defending an unjust and unjustifiable litigation power play [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 1:04 pm
The power to rectify a trust may be used to save the parties from significant taxes that they would otherwise have to pay. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:30 am by J
Barney v Eastern Green Ltd [2013] UKUT 331 (LC) is a helpful little reminder of the (limited) power of the LVT (FTT(PC)) to review apportionment issues in service charges. [read post]