Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M" Results 3061 - 3080 of 33,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 4:28 pm by Will Baude
It rests on the most solid, and narrowest, theory of state standing (proprietary interests in the state universities in Washington and Minnesota). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Iván Ríos Mena
But for this post, I want to hone in for a moment on how to identify the interests behind the positions stated by the parties, or how to read people’s positions and look for interests. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
When It’s a Quarter: The Third Amendment, Originalism, and NSA Wiretapping, Josh Dugan has written the most interesting article I’ve ever read on the Third Amendment to the US Constitution. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:49 am
It was a chance to meet new colleagues, associate faces with those whom I've only had e-contact, and reacquaint myself with old friends.I'm also the new Chair of the Condemnation Law Committee of the State & Local Government Law Section. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 7:48 am
I'm coming a little late to the party, but the case of Omega World Travel, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:13 am
I’ve always been a bit ambivalent about the constitutional standing rules, so I’m not sure what the right answer ought to be; but it will be interesting to see whether the Court decides to provide an answer. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:33 pm by Benjamin Wittes
I’m not sure whether that’s a good thing—a sign of increasing consensus—or a bad thing—a sign of amnesia and denial—but it sure is different. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 3:31 pm by nedaj
Amendments to Investment Adviser Rules in Washington State Washington State Department of Financial Institutions has amended the rules governing the registration and activities of investment advisers set forth in Chapter 460-24A WAC. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 11:19 pm by Jeff Gamso
 That's so, and the cases are hard, even on the rare occasions when the cases - I'm talking here about the ones they discuss - result in complete agreement and no recognition that there are interests at stake other than those the Court honors.There's much to be said for this. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:09 am by Joseph Blocher
To be sure, there is still an active market for proprietary interests in public land; the federal government, after all, owns approximately 30% of the nation’s land. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:56 am by Matthew Kolken
Kennedy: "So you're saying the government has a legitimate interest in not enforcing its laws? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The reference to Lincoln is also interesting, and does not exactly support Santorum’s claim that “states don’t have a right to undermine the basic fundamental values” of the nation. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 12:59 pm by Sayako Takizawa
I’m a professor at the University of Tokyo, teaching Japanese competition law and policy. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:03 am by Jamie Markham
My choice of topic for today’s post may or may not have been influenced by the fact that I’m growing a beard. [read post]