Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 3061 - 3080 of 17,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
And amid all of that activity, the court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Following a 34-day jury trial in August and September 2014, Parnell was found guilty of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, conspiracy to introduce adulterated and misbranded food into interstate commerce, multiple counts of introduction of adulterated food into interstate commerce, multiple counts of Introduction of misbranded food into interstate commerce, multiple counts of mail fraud, multiple counts of wire fraud, and two counts of… [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Kate Evans
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am by Keith Mallinson
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm by Adam Feldman
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
The jury acquitted on one count of felony obstruction and the conspiracy count but convicted on the remaining charges (with the exception that the jury returned a verdict of guilty of misdemeanor obstruction on one of the remaining felony obstruction counts). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Jonathan Bailey
Have any suggestions for the 3 Count? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:52 am by James Romoser
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, which involves the extent of personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. [read post]