Search for: "STATE v. LAWRENCE"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 3,374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
LAWRENCE M. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:06 am
(The canonical citations would be Harlan's dissent in Poe v Ullman, Lawrence v Texas, Justice Powell's plurality in Moore v City of East Cleveland, etc). [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
However, the appeals court found that the trial judge had correctly concluded that Dougherty enjoyed personal immunity based on the state of the law prior to Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:04 am
[www.floridasupport.us]No. 07-7348 IN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EARL WESLEY BERRY, Petitioner V, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections,LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent ofthe Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman,and JOHN DOES 1-50, Respondents ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARITO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OFPETITION FOR A WRIT OF… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
” But even this concept has its limitation, as stated in R v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
These laws are relevant because of the USSC decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
" In Lawrence E. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 5:03 am
The most striking example is provided by the balancing test announced in Mathews v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
------------------------"The United States incarcerates more people than any country in the world," said the Pew Center on the States, in a report released February 28, 2008, One in 100: Behind Bars In America 2008. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 7:45 pm
" The article specifically discusses Justice Scalia's dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 1:41 am
Case Name: Garrison v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 1:41 am
Case Name: Garrison v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:00 pm
It must be an account of why changes in constitutional doctrine over time- which largely occur outside of Article V amendment and are not in the control of any single person, much less any single judge- are legitimate. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:18 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:22 pm
Until Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
And from the text:[V]irtue jurisprudence undermines Fletcher's claim that law must elevate the political above the moral. [read post]
