Search for: "STATE v. MOORE" Results 3061 - 3080 of 3,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Daily Democrat recently reported that the City of Woodland, the League of California Cities, and the California State Association of Counties have submitted a May 2, 2014 depublication request to the California Supreme Court regarding the Third District Court of Appeal’s partially-published decision in California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 15 February 2017, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the case of Bains v Moore [2017] EWHC 242 (QB). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
Some conservatives say foreign practices are irrelevant to U.S. law.Undaunted, Justice Kennedy used his opinion in Monday's case, Graham v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Alana Sheppard
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 4:32 am by Curtis Bradley
To take one example, in upholding an executive agreement made by President Jimmy Carter settling the Iran hostage crisis, the Court in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Russ Bensing
Those were some of the questions raised by State v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Stone v Moore [2016] SASCFC 50 allowed the defendant’s appeal against a judgment dismissing an action for libel and awarded damages of Aus$2,000. [read post]