Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Guy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
But if so, then this provision would work a massive change in the role of the courts in our administrative law system -- an "avulsive change," to use Justice Scalia's disparaging language from United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:18 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:03 am
Board of Education, Reed v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:57 pm
Assuming the request is denied, audio of the oral argument will be available on the Supreme Court's website (HERE), which states: The audio recordings of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States is available to the public at the end of each argument week. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
United States, in which the state seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision blocking the enforcement of key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:51 am
Greene v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
"- Antonin Scalia, oral arguments, US v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:52 am
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) The Justices of the Supreme Court will meet soon to offer preliminary votes in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
The argument in the much-anticipated case of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
But at the end of last Term in PLIVA v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
Here's Samuel Alito, that's Associate Justice Samuel Alito of the Supreme Court of the United States, explaining the problem.The petition in this case concerns bizarre and objectionable testimony given by a “defense expert” at the penalty phase of Buck’s capital trial. [read post]
