Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 3:30 am
Here’s the intro to Cleary’s memo on the decision: On January 14, 2022, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued a decision in SEC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
J7J has sold 33,000 hips in the United States prior to the recall. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 2:39 pm
In Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:51 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 8:22 am
" United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:41 am
The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals tackled that somewhat messy issue with its recent decision and order in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:26 am
United States and the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court, however, found that whatever anomaly might exist, it was consistent with IGRA’s history and design.[15] IGRA was enacted, the Court noted, after the Court’s decision in California v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:22 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in that district court's set aside of a $1.5 billion jury verdict for Lucent Technologies in a highly significant industry standard ISO 11172-3 Audio Layer 3 (MP3) patent case which we wrote about previously as follows:1) Patent Insanity in the USA Continues as Jury Awards Record MP3 Verdict"Only one… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
The appeal in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:58 am
In Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:22 am
The court said in part:In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:30 am
Hildreth v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm
When Gillet discovered that plaintiffs were selling similar pliers in the United States, the company sued them for patent infringement. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm
Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:57 am
State, which discusses American Libraries Ass'n. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Lerner removed the action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to CAFA, and plaintiffs moved to remand. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:53 pm
Regents of the University of California, 10-1029, in which a California law that permits persons who have attended a California high school for three years and who are unlawful residents of the United States to pay in-state tuition while denying those rates to lawful residents of the nation who are not California residents. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
Given this split in the circuits, the case may potentially be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
