Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 32,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2017, 4:37 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:37 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:37 pm
S. 73, 80 (2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
The behaviour of the tax authority is compared to that of a diligent and fair administration in order to assess whether the aid was granted, thus forcing Member States to adopt anti-elusive tools and carry out careful ex ante evaluations of the tax rulings proposed by multinationals. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
Garfinkel, the court states it is forced to examine the plaintiff’s constitutional claim because this is largely the basis for the district court’s injunction. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
If a major hurricane hit a large metropolitan area today, the state could be forced to boost taxes on insurance policies and take out billions in debt to cover shortfalls in taxpayer-backed insurance plans. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
If a major hurricane hit a large metropolitan area today, the state could be forced to boost taxes on insurance policies and take out billions in debt to cover shortfalls in taxpayer-backed insurance plans. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:23 am
NYCERS v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:45 am
In Creative Dimensions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:23 am
Since it is clearly established law that the reasonableness of the amount of force is determined "at the moment" the force is used. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am
Rapp based his case on the 1987 US Supreme Court case Houston v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:15 pm
The court relied on the awful Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF… [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
Georgia and Texas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:15 am
United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Owen, 563 N.E.2d 605, 608; State v. [read post]
