Search for: "State v. London"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 3,559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
This would put us at odds with every other civilised state. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
For example, consider the recent case of O.M. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm
Representing the NRA, David Cole of the American Civil Liberties Union characterized the case as a “straightforward” application of the court’s 1963 decision in Bantam Books v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
Department of State.? [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:26 am
’ Section (iv) usefully reviews the current position on SLAPP legislation in Dublin and London, and invokes the judgment in Kelly v O’Doherty (see here for commentary) to discuss the costs deterrent associated with defending SLAPPs, while section (ii) also articulates the potential practical challenge of obtaining collaborative support from the Department of Justice and the Executive to realise legislative movement on the issue. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
Burkhard is licensed to practice law in Germany and is standing legal counsel to the German operation of the London-based Howden Broking Group. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:34 am
Malaysia [Updated Case]State Government of Negeri Sembilan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:29 am
A glaring example is the highly debated and publicized case of Owens v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Columbia University)Hopenhayn Hugo (UCLA)Hurst Erik (University of Chicago)Imrohoroglu Ayse (University of Southern California)Isakson Hans (University of Northern Iowa)Israel Ronen (London Business School)Jaffee Dwight M. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
This position is to be contrasted with other jurisdictions such as the United States which has varying degrees of protection for personality rights and the right of publicity at state level. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
Peacock also sold DVDs on his website, sleazymichael.com, and in the London-based gay magazine, Boyz. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
He analyses the matter with precision: Spartacus restored scene – starring David Cameron Julian Assange, facing extradition to Sweden to answer questions about his sexual conduct, took refuge in the London embassy of Ecuador on Tuesday evening. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3] Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal statutory violations (for… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm
The seat of arbitration was Paris but the hearings were held for convenience in London. 27.05.2002: The award was passed in May 2002. [read post]
