Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 3061 - 3080
of 51,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The author analyses the background of the decision and discusses its consequences for the long-standing conflict of procedural laws ( Justizkonflikt) between the United States and Germany. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
See Kanter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In the state case of California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:56 pm
Yesterday the Court reversed in Mallory v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
From Illegality to Harm For so long as the platform regulation debate centred around liability, it also had to be about illegality: if the use [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:53 am
Schutte v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
And it is this power of the federal government to exclude as well as direct states and non-Indians when it comes to relations with tribes that has a long and well-established pedigree: it was the understanding embodied in the Constitution in the wake of the Articles, advocated for by Native peoples (as Greg Ablavsky and I have traced), and affirmed in the foundational Indian law case of Worcester v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:44 am
The state supreme court ruled in 2019 that as long as a public space is designated as off-limits for alcohol 24/7/365, a city (in that case, Beaverton) could ban drinking there and not run afoul of this statute. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:42 am
Although the conventional wisdom sees Castro-Huerta as a radical departure from first principles of federal Indian law, I argue that it is the natural – although deeply deplorable – next step in a long line of Supreme Court decisions expanding state governmental authority within Indian country. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:17 am
” Attendance of a legal representative ensures that the examination is conducted fairly and addresses any concerns about the process.ADJUSTING THE POWER BALANCEAs Justice Wainer-Apter stated, "...a DME reflects a profound power imbalance between the plaintiff and a medical professional with long experience in the examination of patients and participation in court proceedings. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
At the same time, he shares his perspective on why the PFAS problem went unchecked and unreported for so long. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
Today, the Court resolved the question in Counterman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
By relabeling their long-arm statutes,” she wrote, “States may now manufacture ‘consent’ to personal jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
On June 23, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a ruling in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
In 2019, in Rucho v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:30 am
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Anne K. [read post]
