Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
The United States Supreme Court had just decided Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Mark McAdams and R. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:16 am
Peter Turdin, Jr. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
“Marriage Equality,” as the New York statute is entitled, has been a hard fought battle.New York’s highest court held that there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage in Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
" This time, in Delhaize America, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
The court then holds that Marks v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:28 am
See Lane Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 5:11 am
Quirk, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
Complete the look: Ralph Lauren Polo sweaterKat friend Just Wang analyses another Singaporean opposition trade mark case, in which passing off was relied on as the single (and successful) ground of opposition: When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark.In the conclusion of another trade mark battle, Mr Justice Arnold has handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155: BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v… [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am
The Rogers v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 1:00 pm
On October 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia’s Opinion and Order in Mark C. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 1:00 pm
On October 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia’s Opinion and Order in Mark C. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:00 am
TortTalkers may recall a previous Tort Talk post on the case of Cost v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:59 pm
This week, the Fourth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
DISMISSAL OF FEDERAL CASE OPERATED AS A RES JUDICATA BAR TO STATE COURT CLAIMSAfter the Monroe County Supreme Court granted her former employer’s motion to dismiss discrimination and retaliation claims, Dr. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:37 pm
The case is Burton v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
Foley, and former Hawaii Attorney General Mark J. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Second, they stated that the ads not misleading either for three reasons:eBay's use of Tiffany's mark was protected, nominative fair useTiffany has not proved that eBay had specific knowledge as to the illicit nature of individual listings. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
Stevens, supra quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
