Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 3061 - 3080 of 57,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2006, 12:33 pm
The Constitutional right to travel as stated in Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) may even be implicated. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
After being arrested, Christy admitted to a State-administered breath-test, which indicated a BAC of .192. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:24 pm by Jason Kilborn
§ 544(b), allowing recovery of a “transfer of an interest of the debtor in property” if state law criteria are met (though the state laws that this statute incorporates generally do refer to a transfer by the debtor). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in Jett v Dallas… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:22 am
The mayor vetoes the proposed ordinance, even though he's sympathetic to the measure, because the County Attorney has said that it's preempted by state law. [read post]