Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 20,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
[xx]Washington and Ohio also collect a B & O tax but on a state-wide basis. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Both sales were conducted within 1,000 feet of a school zone. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:12 am
(See – Shirley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
Cuban centers on the sale of his stake in Mamma.com just before the company announced a private placement of shares. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry & US v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
However, a “significant portion of the remainder of the goods” are legitimate products whose sale, nonetheless, for various reasons had not been authorized by the relevant trade mark owners. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Summary judgment for the employer was reversed on the contract claim (Balding v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:13 am
This is because the relevant terms and conditions of the latter two expressly state that no ownership right over the relevant content is acquired [here and here]. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 10:12 am
But then in a federal breach of contract case involving a state-legal cannabis company (Siva Enterprises v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:34 am
In Hartfield v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
OTR sued West, asserting various claims under the Lanham Act and state law. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:48 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
Salon FAD v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:21 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 4:33 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:11 pm
United States (1997) and New York v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm
Red-Baron-Franklin Park, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:38 am
The United States District Court of Nebraska entered a consent order on March 3, 2010 in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
" Tiffany alleged that because eBay advertised the sale of Tiffany goods on its website and that many of those goods were counterfeit, eBay should be liable for false advertising. [read post]
