Search for: "State v. Whited" Results 3061 - 3080 of 13,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm by Anushka Limaye
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided a comprehensive summary of last week’s military commission proceedings in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:26 am by SHG
When the Supremes decided in Maryland v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:28 pm by Christopher Collins
Supreme Court struck down the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman under the federal Defense of Marriage Act in U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Judge Nardini writes, "The problem with Murray’s claim is that, as the Supreme Court held  in  Rivera  v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
California’s affirmative action ban, added to the state constitution when voters passed Proposition 209 in November 1996, did not violate the US Constitution, the Ninth Circuit held on Monday (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Brown, April 2, 2012). [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am by Richard Mumford
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by INFORRM
But in the early hours of December 25, 2013, unknown protestors in the town of Blagoevgrad had gone to the square in the town centre and daubed red and white paint over a statue of Dimitar Blagoev, making it resemble Father Christmas. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Georgina Allen
This is no longer true, but as with a lot of things in law, the answer isn’t black and white! [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]