Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 4,052
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 3:10 pm
The Supreme Court has ruled that a nationwide class action lawsuit challenging sex discrimination in pay and promotions at Wal-Mart cannot go forward. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
New Mexico, involved a New Mexico man who was prosecuted for driving while intoxicated. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:38 am
GREG FULTZ, the disgruntled ex- boyfriend, who used a billboard on the main street of his town in New Mexico to accuse his former girlfriend (unnamed) of killing his baby when she had an abortion, was ordered by the court to immediately remove the sign. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:24 am
New Mexico, handed down yesterday. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
New Mexico, the Confrontation Clause case, David Savage at the Los Angeles Times summarizes the decision and looks at the effect that the Court’s holding will have on crime labs. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:58 am
Allowing states to determine their own marijuana policy flies in the face of Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Plus I love the suit, but could never pull it off.In other news, the Supreme Court really means what it says in the Confrontation Clause cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
In another 5-4 decision, though borne of strange bedfellows, the Supreme Court has reversed in Bullcoming v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
New Mexico, the Court narrowly repulsed an attack on Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:11 am
New Mexico,... [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
New Mexico, reversing the New Mexico Supreme Court's decision allowing the state to introduce a blood alcohol result through the testimony of a chemist who did not conduct the test. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:06 pm
New Mexico [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:37 pm
New Mexico is a game-changer, we need look no further than Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion to see that Bullcoming will have very little, if any, effect on court-martial jurisprudence. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
Today, in Bullcoming v New Mexico (see _US_ [6/23/11]), the Court decided the related issue of whether the Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce a forensic laboratory report containing a testimonial certification— made for the purpose of proving a particular fact—through the in-court testimony of a scientist who did not sign the certification or perform or observe the test reported in the certification. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:07 pm
The New Mexico courts held the report was testimonial, and therefore the confrontation clause applied. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
By the 5-4 vote, the Court overturned a decision of the New Mexico Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
New Mexico, the Court reversed the decision of the New Mexico Supreme Court and remanded the case for further proceedings. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:29 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
New Mexico, the sequel to Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
New Mexico today, holding that the Sixth Amendment precludes the State from introducing a lab report of a forensic blood test without calling the analyst who conducted the analysis. [read post]
