Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Not stopping there, the court went on to hold that: (1) “because the consumer can not and does not decide what product to purchase” when a prescription is required, and (2) “the high degree of federal regulation,” by the FDA, prescription medical products are not subject to consumer protection claims at all. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
McRae, Robert T. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Such expressive activities—speech-motivated threats, batteries, and the like—are simply not protected expression within the meaning of the First Amendment (just as defamation is not protected expression). [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
I decided to take up the court's open invitation to file amicus briefs in this case (follow the link if you want more facts); the Rutherford Institute has also apparently decided to do the same. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:17 pm
For example, read the amicus brief filed by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. in the AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
We don’t create a class of outcasts preemptively precluded from seeking the protection of the law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
The intervention is necessary to protect the interests of merchants and consumers, and the health of the broader economy. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:29 am
Fortunately, in the Zango v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:02 am
The consumer clips are typically rounded up through a contest, with a promise to broadcast or post the winners. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 9:46 am
The court says that the statute is intended to protect consumers against the costs and privacy invasions that accompany unsolicited text messages, and regulating texts sent through auto-dialers adequately serves this interest. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Uncertainties as to the bound of ACPA (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) This case is not over. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Uncertainties as to the bound of ACPA (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) This case is not over. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Uncertainties as to the bound of ACPA (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) This case is not over. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:28 am
Don’t try to fix the problem, just try to cover it up! [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
Hershkovitz v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 6:42 am
’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws In re. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Open access for University College of London research product (1709 Copyright Blog) Research by Bournemouth University and FremantleMedia ‘The exploitation of television formats: intellectual property and non-law based strategies (1709 Copyright Blog) Virgin Media, Universal Music team up to offer UK unlimited music (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Osgoode) SCRIPT establishes IP Foresight Forum to discuss IP and media law and policy development (IPKat) … [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Without disclosing details, the OFT said its investigation examined whether that had been an infringement of the consumer protection legislation enforced by the OFT under the Enterprise Act 2002. [read post]
