Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
On a balancing exercise, the Court found that an Article 8 challenge would have no real prospects of success and a possession order was made.Comment: it is interesting to observe in this case a focus on the decision to continue with proceedings rather than to start them, which one gets from Central Bedfordshire v Taylor para. 40 and Pinnock  para.45. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
On a balancing exercise, the Court found that an Article 8 challenge would have no real prospects of success and a possession order was made.Comment: it is interesting to observe in this case a focus on the decision to continue with proceedings rather than to start them, which one gets from Central Bedfordshire v Taylor para. 40 and Pinnock  para.45. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
See, for example, City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2 104, a case addressing a conflict between a Taylor Law contract provision and the Civil Service Law with regard to the layoff rights of employees. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
That doctrine, under the current law, had arisen in two previous English cases, Rotocrop International Ltd v Genbourne Ltd [1982] FSR 241 and Lacroix Duarib SA v Kwikform (UK) Ltd [1998] FSR 493. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on the April 29 argument in Glossip v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 8:36 am by Kara OBrien
  Gibson Dunn partners Daniel Swanson, David Wood, and James Ashe-Taylor will be joined by Jasper de Gou, Senior Competition Counsel of Akzo Nobel N.V. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
See Matter of Uniform Firefighters v City of Cohoes, 94 NY2d 686, 694 [2000].Mitchell H. [read post]