Search for: "Town v. State" Results 3061 - 3080 of 5,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 6:16 am
Matter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of ...publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/... [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:52 am by Patricia Salkin
Forster v Town of Henniker, 2015 WL 3638597 (NH 6/12/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampshire/supreme-court/2015/2013-089.htmlFiled under: Accessory Uses, Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Preemption Tagged: agritourism, christsmas tree farm [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R. v Butler, 2017 CanLII 86418 (NL PC) [19] There can be coincidental meetings of people, especially in small towns: see for example R. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
We don’t want a ghost town in downtown Coral Gables. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy has the opinion for the Court in Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:17 am
No wonder CNN entitled a recent program: Toxic towns: People of Mossville are 'like an experiment.'After trying to achieve change through state and federal authorities and through the companies themselves, the residents of Mossville turned to international human rights bodies. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:30 am
State Funding for Interdistrict Magnet Schools - 2010-R-0056On July 9, 1996, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the racial, economic, and ethnic isolation in the Hartford school district and those of its surrounding towns violated Connecticut's constitution and ordered the state to remedy that violation (Sheff v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:15 am by Daniel Richardson
  The group received the necessary permits from the state and a Resort Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit from the town. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
***  * In its Stewart decision, the Appellate Division states "Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably “to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force,” (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Supp. 3d 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) – to the extent that’s even possible under United States v. [read post]