Search for: "U. S. Federal Government"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 5,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 10:57 am
Godinez, 2014 IL App (4th) 130686-U (IL App., June 18, 2014), an Illinois state appellate court upheld a prison's refusal to provide study groups and prayer services for Nation of Islam inmates. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:04 am
Because the Lanham Act lacked a federal rule for personal jurisdiction, the appeals panel determined that it must look to the forum for the governing rule on personal jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:11 am
The trademark protection remains until appeals are completed.The decision strips the franchise of legal presumption of ownership and the ability to use the federal trademark symbol and block importation of counterfeit Redskins goods.Bob Raskopf, a trademark lawyer for the Redskins, said the club would appeal the ruling to federal court. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
Yaretsky, 457 U. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
Here's what it said in its opinion about this argument (and its basis for rejecting it):"Finally, the Government suggests that our holding will frustrate the enforcement of other aggravated felony provisions, like §1101(a)(43)(C), which refers to a federal firearms statute that contains an exception for 'antique firearm[s],' 18 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
Altmann, 541 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:29 am
" (U. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:29 am
” (U. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
”The Court then rejected the government’s confusing halfway approach, which wouldn’t have allowed POM to challenge the name but would have allowed other challenges to the configuration of the label. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
21 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:15 am
If its original purpose was to reduce U. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
., “[a]m going to make sure u fucking hate me. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
In that context, it’s worth recalling at the outset what sort of speech we routinely protect under the First Amendment and how it compares with the sort of speech you are now being asked to permit both the federal and state governments to criminalize. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Rev. 127, 130 (2013)); John Wroldsen, THE CROWDFUND ACT'S STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: DEMOCRACY AND START-UP COMPANY INVESTING, 62 U. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, for the majority: “The global need to prevent chemical warfare does not require the federal government to reach into the kitchen cupboard, or to treat a local assault with a chemical irritant as the deployment of a chemical weapon. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Robertson, 124 U. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
As the Government reads section 229, “hardly” a poisoning “in the land would fall outside the federal statute’s domain. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Editor’s Note: The Pakistani people’s deep opposition to U.S. drone strikes against targets in Pakistan is common wisdom, and some observers see the associated anger as a major source of the country’s rampant anti-Americanism. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Menell by Peter S. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States, 323 U. [read post]
