Search for: "U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2011, 7:01 am by Susan Brenner
As I’ve noted in those posts, every U.S. state and the federal system has an evidentiary rule that bars the use of hearsay unless it falls within an exception to the rule barring its use. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Bob Kraft
To combat this broken system, the plaintiff bar has joined forces with a natural opponent, the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Bob Kraft
To combat this broken system, the plaintiff bar has joined forces with a natural opponent, the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by David Cruz
  Given the weakness of the claimed federal interests behind the Act, the courts of appeals and, if need be eventually, the Supreme Court should be able to strike down the federal definition section of DOMA without necessarily also proclaiming invalid the mixed-sex requirement for civil marriage in the ninety percent of states that still have it. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The court held that plaintiffs did exhaust its administrative remedies, but its claim arose out of a misrepresentation and was barred by the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. 2671. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Plaintiffs' Legal Committee (2001), federal patent law bars an aggrieved patent owner-plaintiff from asserting a state law claim seeking relief for harm to patent property rights caused by a private party maliciously initiating a sham administrative patent reexamination proceeding before the U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:20 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Kolstad v American Dental Association, 527 US 526. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
In 1994, Bacardi filed a federal trade mark application for the use HAVANA CLUB mark on rum in the U.S. and in the following year Bacardi importated rum from the Bahamas and sold it in the US under the mark for a small amount of time. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Weissbluth, senior counsel and Aubrey Refuerzo, summer associate, Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
What the law really protects is U.S. claim to invention, ignoring what foreigners may have done. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
Railroad Friction Products Corp. (10-879) — does federal law bar railroad workers from suing in state courts for injuries while repairing locomotives   [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
On May 7, the district court judge sentenced him under the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
  During the first, in the early nineteenth century, the Court interpreted the Tenth Amendment to bar federal legislation related to manufacturing and production – areas traditionally within the states’ police powers. [read post]