Search for: "United States Solicitor General"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 4,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm
Would the President have ever been willing to consider appointing Clement as the Solicitor General? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:32 pm
Solicitor General’s Supreme Court petition questioning a decision of the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:46 am
For example, his moral outrage over this same Court declaring corporations to be people in Citizens United is echoed in Toobin’s clear moral contempt for questions directed from conservative Justices to the Solicitor General that suggest sympathy for the insurance companies which are subject to Romney/Obamacare. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:55 am
Solicitor General, and combined have argued more than 60 cases before the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
The Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
The administration’s position presented by Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
CVSG: Now, the Supreme Court has invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in the case. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
The Justices are free, of course, to ignore the arguments both of the President and of his Solicitor General. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:33 am
The Court also invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in two cases. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
As the Solicitor General explained in the Anti-Injunction Act argument, such a payment satisfies one's legal obligation under the Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
Specifically, for “intentional or willful” violations, the United States is liable for “actual damages. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
MARK SHIELDS: What I heard, Judy, was a political discussion, a reminder that a judge is a lawyer who is appointed to that office by a politician, and that it struck me as rather remarkable to hear judges -- justices of the United States Supreme Court reciting lines that were -- actually questions that were written by the Tea Party opposition to the law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
DONALD VERRILLI, solicitor general of the United States: Because the -- the -- the -- excuse me. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
United States, and City of Boerne v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
To be sure, during the oral argument, Justice Breyer may have undermined the effectiveness of his hypo by appearing to agree with Michael Carvin (for the NFIB) that the argument for federal power in the inoculation case is of a piece with the argument for federal power in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
(Solicitor General Don Verrilli). 7. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
