Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by David Wagner
Effluent guidelines for oil and gas extraction prohibit the on-site direct discharge of wastewater from shale gas extraction into waters of the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
”   The core idea of the revised theory is that the original meaning of the constitution is the original public meaning of the constitutional text. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
No. 40145/98)]; residents of a slum that was engulfed by a methane explosion from a neighbouring tip [Oneryildiz v Turkey (2004) 41 EHRR 20l]; and a local authority moving an elderly resident between care homes [Watts v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 66]. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
He said: “The key would be to make the cards available only to members of print newsgathering organisations or magazines who have signed up the new body and its code… The public at large would know journalists carrying such cards are bone fide operators committed to a set of standards and a body to who complaints can be made…I think the beauty of the system, the attraction of the system, is it will be the newspaper industry registering and disciplining journalists, not the… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:40 pm by Philip Favro
United States, asserting that the message reflected discussions about litigation strategy between a company engineer and in-house counsel. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am by admin
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am by Darren O'Donovan
(no referendum held) Ireland is a members of the United Nations and legislatively ratified the United Nations Charter. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm by Sandy Levinson
The Founders in Philadelphia wisely [my emphasis] made it difficult to change this core document.... [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm by Venkat
Either way, none of the stories bothered to get into the details on what I thought were the two core issues. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:43 am
  Section 157(d) of title 28 of the United States Code mandates withdrawal if resolution of the proceeding involves the Bankruptcy Code and other laws affecting interstate commerce. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:30 am by SHG
  Colorado District Court Judge Robert Blackburn has issued a decision in United States v. [read post]