Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 3061 - 3080 of 16,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by Alana Sheppard
In total, this law allows over 800,000 adult permanent residents in New York City to vote, making New York City the largest jurisdiction in the United States to authorize noncitizens to vote. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:53 pm
In less legalistic, more straightforward terms,  MVAIC's website gives this explanation of what a "qualified person" is: QUALIFIED PERSON is a resident of New York State or a resident of another state or country having a substantially similar program available to New York State residents injured in that state or country. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., Nov. 19, 2019), a New York state trial court held that a proselytizing pamphlet and a subsequent e-mail did not amount to intentional infliction of emotional distress, nor was any injury proven. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDefendant Refusing to Cooperate With Counsel Competent; 'Precautionary' Exam, Testimony Noted United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New in the latest issue of the Journal of American History: “There isn't no trouble at all if the state law would keep out”: Indigenous People and New York's Carceral State by Christopher Clements. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 That is what defense lawyers argue in a motion filed today in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York in the case of US v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDeportee's Sentence Vacatur Motion Denied; Claim Would Have Been Successive Habeas Petition United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:52 pm by Victoria VanBuren
June 13, 2011), this Court affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, see 618 F.Supp. 2d 276 (2009) (“Fensterstock I“), denying defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, holding that the arbitration clause of the promissory note at issue was, because of its class-action and class-arbitration waiver provision, unconscionable under Discover Bank v. [read post]