Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 3061 - 3080 of 6,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2016, 7:20 pm
"Op-Doc: Supreme Court v. the American Voter; This year's election will be the first in over 50 years without the full protection of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
City officials believe the Supreme Court’s widely reviled Kelo v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
” ImmigrationProf Blog discusses Lynch v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
But “prying eyes” could not see what the voter was actually doing in the booth and so did not likely intimidate voters or cause them to change their vote. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:57 am by Betty Lupinacci
In the second referendum, held in 1997, the vote was closer than the Brexit referendum, with 50.3% of voters in favor of creating a legislative assembly and 49.7% against. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel suggests that next term’s Salman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Schiedegger responds to Akil Amar’s recent commentary on the exclusionary rule in this blog’s symposium on the Court after Scalia, contending that last Term’s decision in Utah v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:41 am by Kevin
To begin with, here are these items: Another candidate for the Comical Case Names page is People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:58 am by Joe Patrice
[The Intercept] * The next Brown v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
The voters’ choice of president and members of Congress, and then the choice of the next Supreme Court Justice, will determine whether the drive to extreme religious liberty will be checked or abetted. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:55 am by Jared Staver
Recognizing the role that alcohol continues to play in car accidents in the state of Illinois, voters have enacted a constitutional amendment to the Illinois state constitution in November 2014 which provides substantive rights to victims of certain crimes, including victims of drunken driving. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am by Edith Roberts
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin discusses the Justice Department’s effort to strengthen its case in Jennings v. [read post]