Search for: "WEEKLY v. STATE" Results 3061 - 3080 of 3,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Bruno Aiub (Monark) and State Prosecution Office (São Paulo, MPSP) v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
An option would be to provide for greater state agency involvement with authority to review settlements. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Jeff Welty
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:30 am
So productive, it seems, that the bulk of US news stories that she was to write about in her weekly Letter she already posted during the week. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:00 pm by Moses & Rooth Attorneys at Law
An official may reduce a legal penalty: Within 60 days after its imposition, or thereafter with good cause shown State of Florida v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:51 am by Eugene Volokh
The city judge will either let misdemenor offenders work off their sentences in jail and pay a fine or go to church every Sunday for a year.If offenders elect church, they’re allowed to pick the place of worship, but must check in weekly with the pastor and the police department. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:56 am
 The case is Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:38 am by Robert A. Epstein
Bringing us to the Appellate Division's newly unreported decision in Livingstone v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 8:23 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The Authority is headed by Secretary of State Víctor Suárez, who previously served as the Governor’s Chief of Staff and Director of the Ports Authority prior to that. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm by Nassiri Law
For example, drivers have to clean (vacuum and wash) their vehicles at least once weekly. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 1:51 pm by admin
The June 15, 2011 court order is related to an August 30, 2010 decision in CATA v. [read post]