Search for: "WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm
The trial court reduced the non-economic damages to the state's $1M damages cap, and the Plaintiff appealed the trial court's reduction to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:37 am by Jim Sedor
Appeals Decision Overturning Ban on Corporate Donations to Candidates Weiner Resigns in Chaotic Final Scene From the States and Municipalities: Colorado Complaint Filed against Secretary of State Scott Gessler Connecticut Ethics Dispute Drained Local Budget of More than $630,000 Georgia Shake-Up at Ethics Commission as Top Staffers to Exit Hawaii State Drops Campaign Gift Appeal Massachusetts DiMasi Found Guilty on Seven of Nine Counts in Kickback Scheme No Fault Found in House… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am by Sean Wajert
The Wisconsin court of appeals last week affirmed the dismissal of a plaintiff's medical monitoring complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm by Daniel Suhr
The issues in the decision came to the court in two ways: an appeal from a temporary order that had been certified by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and a petition for a supervisory writ filed by Secretary Huebsch. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm by Daniel Suhr
The issues in the decision came to the court in two ways: an appeal from a temporary order that had been certified by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and a petition for a supervisory writ filed by Secretary Huebsch.  [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:05 am by Associated Press
(AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court won’t hear Mark Jensen’s appeal of his conviction for killing his wife. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by Marie Louise
(Excess Copyright) Ontario Court of Appeal opines on technology licences in receivership case: Canrock Ventures LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
June 14, 2011), the Wisconsin Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of numerous plaintiffs’ claims for medical monitoring, holding that the plaintiffs’ alleged increased risk of future harm was not an actual injury that would support an award of damages under Wisconsin law. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
June 14, 2011), the Wisconsin Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of numerous plaintiffs’ claims for medical monitoring, holding that the plaintiffs’ alleged increased risk of future harm was not an actual injury that would support an award of damages under Wisconsin law. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:14 am by David Ziemer
In the first appellate case to interpret the statute, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals concluded on June 1 that “concurrent jurisdiction” only means that both courts could exercise jurisdiction over a [...] [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:15 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Today's leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Exclusive: Judge Bars Woman From Suing Over Faulty Google Map - http://goo.gl/6cH1m Justice Department Accused of ‘Reckless Technique’ -http://goo.gl/iBBrMQueen of S&M talks on eve of sex trade appeal - Toronto Star -http://goo.gl/NJZB6Internet Access as a Human Right - http://goo.gl/2Na7vOntario privacy commissioner Ann Cavoukian:.Mobile Wi-Fi makes users 'unknowing informants' (CBC) -… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 10:42 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has voted to accept five new cases. 2009AP1505-CR State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:04 am by Eric
An appeals court will feel free to substitute their own considerations for the judge’s proffered rationales. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:01 pm by Associated Press
(AP) — Attorneys for Republican lawmakers asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Monday to overturn a judge’s order blocking the state’s polarizing union rights law, while Democrats urged the justices to uphold the ruling or make the GOP go through the usual — and slow — appeals process. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm by Howard Ullman
  On appeal, the national organization emphasized a goal of increasing the racial and ethnic diversity of the Girl Scouts (picking up on the district court’s First Amendment reasoning). [read post]