Search for: "Waits v. State"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 10,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2013, 4:54 am
A federal district court would not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the state-law claims (which could be heard by a California state court) but would have jurisdiction to hear the three federal claims. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:02 am
I can't wait. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
However, Moore v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:36 pm
USCIS is adopting the decision issued by the Ninth Circuit in Medina Tovar v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
Employees who are unjustly dismissed cannot simply sit back, relax and wait for their payday in court. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Alternatively, Dobbs, Bruen, and West Virginia v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:09 am
First, as we have previously stated on this Blog, if the Supreme Court were to rule in Christopher v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:08 pm
In short, we could be waiting a long time for a case that brings further clarity about the continuing vitality and scope of the California Rule. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
This is in response to the CJEU case of Maximiliam Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which declared invalid the previous agreement called Safe Harbor (our take on the case here). [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:26 pm
” See, e.g., First Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 1:43 pm
For example, during oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:13 pm
Wait a minute now. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
Hurst v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm
Cappuccitti v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
Castro v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:28 am
Gardner and State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
But property rights advocates should not wait for the Supreme Court to solve this problem. [read post]
