Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 3061 - 3080 of 29,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am by Michael F. Smith
  That was the Court’s holding Wednesday in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:33 am by Christopher Tyner
There was sufficient evidence that the defendant acted with “deceit and intent to defraud” in this common law obstruction of justice case such that the offense was punishable as a felony rather than a misdemeanor State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:36 am by SHG
Montgomery County not only makes some excellent and valuable points, but could well be a precursor to a significant shift in the Court’s position. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm
As we argued in our friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:38 am by First Mondays
International Refugee Assistance Project, as well as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s public comments about the case. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
A fourth possibility is that the administration thinks that a five-Justice majority will only rule for Texas on standing if it’s dead-set on striking down DAPA—in which case an ideologically motivated majority will side with Texas on the substance as well. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:12 pm
  But I'll agree that Justice Raye makes a strong case that any buyer should have probably wanted riparian rights as well. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am by William G. Ross
  During the next four years, the Court’s decisions, particularly Miranda v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm by INFORRM
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm by David S. Cohen
  Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm by Christopher Bird
Each week at Wise Law Blog, we review decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.R. v. [read post]