Search for: "Williams v. Downes" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm by Mateusz Rachubka
In the amicus curiae brief 212 songwriters, composers and musicians supporting the appellants [Williams and Thicke] shared the view that "[t]he verdict in this case, threatens to punish songwriters for creating new music that is inspired by prior works. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  William Marbury did not get his commission. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
Williams], 392 F.3d at 485 [Williams, J., concurring], after sleeping on the matter, we are convinced that sleep is a vital life activity in its own right. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In my mind, this was a preview of the bitterness to come if the Court struck down the ACA. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Whilst the branches of government can tolerate a degree of antagonism and confrontation at times, it cannot be conflict all the way down. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  Simply to provide some organizing principle, I have broken the issues down according to whether they rise under the body of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, or statutes. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
2010 amendments to Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Statute shoot down …  (Parret v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:11 am by Lovechilde
We see Beckett v Verlander, and then Lester v Doug Davis. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:23 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This challenge was highlighted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Bell Canada v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 8:38 am by Richard Hunt
³ Instead we need regulations that adopt a functional approach to accessibility – the kind of approach used by Judge William Orrick in the recent decision in Gomez v. [read post]