Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 3061 - 3080 of 6,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In denying the review, three Supreme Court justices offered a statement of explanation, authored by Chief Justice Cantil-Skaue, “Our denial of a petition for review does not communicate any particular view regarding the merits of the issues presented in the petition. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm by cdw
The district court dismissed the indictment after finding that an earlier plea agreement between Raymond and the United States precluded the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico from pursuing  these charges Jeffrey Williams v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Even as a Justice on the Supreme Court, Holmes would regularly be mistaken for the author of Old Ironsides or Elsie Vedder. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf focuses on another of last Thursday’s decisions:  United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in The Washington Post, Angela Allen-Bell urges the court to review Lambert v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
On appeal the court lowered the sentence for count 2 (making false ID documents) but the sentence for copyright infringement remained unaltered – six months.Secondly, in R v Ross (William Keith) [2012] EWCA Crim 750, 21 February 2012 in the Crown Court at Newcastle Ross, pleaded guilty to one count of distributing/infringing copies of copyright works, contrary to section 107(1)(d)(iv) of the CDPA 1988. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:10 am by Conor McEvily
”  As James reported Monday, one of the petitions that the Justices will consider at their September 26 Conference is Williams v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Williams, 425 U.S. 501 (1976); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970); 9 J. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Alan Blinder reports on the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision last term in Hurst v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:07 am by Todd Zywicki
A few reports from the time note the absence of the Justices, and that some of them had travel conflicts (it is not clear whether those were avoidable or convenient-I recall William F. [read post]