Search for: "AT&T"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 881,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
Atari Interactive, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED). [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This decision also contains an interesting statement on the value of computer simulations:[4.3] It is also undisputed between the parties that the condenser of granted claim 1 differs explicitly from [the] prior art only in the additional presence of the SICC duct. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
This decision deals with an appeal filed by the patent proprietor against the revocation of its patent by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
For a claim to lack inventive step, it is not necessary that all its features be shown in the prior art. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
The present decision brings us back to the beginnings of European patent case law. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an examination appeal.Claim 1 before the Board read (in English translation):1. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
The present decision deals with a rather unusual request for reimbursement of the appeal fee. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
In this case claims 1 to 4 related to hydrophilic sulphonamide derivatives, claim 5 to their use as a medicament, claim 6 to their use for the preparation of a medicament against certain diseases, claim 7 to pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds, and claims 8 and 9 to processes for making the compounds. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:37 am
HOLA. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:01 pm
When there is no clear-cut evidence that a technical problem has been solved, the credibility that the problem has indeed been solved becomes crucial for the assessment of inventive step. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:03 pm
It is one of the worst nightmares of a patent attorney to have an assistant who does not do what he/she is asked to do and even starts hiding facts and notifications. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
This appeal was filed against the refusal of the application under consideration by the Examining Division. [read post]
25 May 2016, 4:24 am
“A hearing panel ultimately concluded that both Ameriprise and Mr. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
I found this decision noteworthy because it is the first time I see an interlocutory decision on taking of evidence.Both the patent proprietor and the opponent had filed an appeal against the maintenance of the opposed patent, which is directed at the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy by removal of autoantibodies.[1] Document E1 in the present proceedings is a so-called “Eidesstattliche Versicherung” by Dr W. dated 10 February 2005. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:06 pm
The present appeal was filed after the Examining Division (ED) had refused the patent application.In the proceedings before the ED, the applicant had several times filed amended claims in reply to communications. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
sad, disappointing …… this is hard to believe …. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm
The present decision concerns a textbook example of a ‘wish claim’. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
*** Translation from the French *** [3.5] The only open question is whether the solution which the opposed patent provides to the problem can be derived in an obvious manner from the available prior art, i.e. whether it was obvious for the skilled person to associate, in a targeted way (de façon ciblée), a dialkyl tartrate and filters of a type derived from benzylidene camphor and/or dibenzoylmethane in order to improve its photoprotective power. [3.5.1] Document D2 does not mention… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
I find this decision interesting because it shows that there are disclaimer-transmitted diseases (DTD): a disclaimer may transmit a deficiency such as a lack of clarity from the disclaimed prior art to the claim comprising the disclaimer.The appeal was directed against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the patent.Claim 1 before the Board read (in English translation):The use of an adhesive tape having a tape-like backing of non-woven material, which is coated on at least one side… [read post]
