Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 3081 - 3100 of 15,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am by Will Aitchison
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:29 am by Lyle Denniston
  (All of the cases bear the same title, Perry v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) put an end to all suspense and resistance, stating it was perfectly legal for a contract to stipulate that the buyer bears the re-sale right royalty in the context of a sale between professionals, thereby siding with the CJEU (here). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:38 am by Paul Venard
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am by Maria Roche
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment  Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
More recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of the defendant in Wood v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am by INFORRM
Further, the instantaneous nature of the processing and short storage of processing did not have a bearing on this. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
Which, as its very first paragraph amply reveals, is exclusively about whether the particular criminal defendant here is required to pay the $15 state court construction penalty and the $10 state court surcharge. [read post]