Search for: "COOPER v. LONG"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 3,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
Father Hesburgh has long spoken of this institution as both a lighthouse and a crossroads. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:40 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel ruled in Embry v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
Starting in June 2006, the Department of Justice, with the aid of the Federal Trade Commission, embarked on a year-long series of joint hearings to study issues relating to enforcement of Section 2 against single-firm conduct. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
Maybe not perfect, but I think it's at least close.Anyway, it's an extremely interesting, if long, set of opinions. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:11 pm
Nix v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
" Caraker v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:19 am
Robert Colville and Trial Lawyers - Sean Carmody, Scott Cooper, James Haggerty, David Lutz, Jason Matzus, Tim Riley, Frank Wesner, Jr., and Lisa M. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
At the end of 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
It can be difficult to hold governmental bodies accountable based on regulatory authority using the modified Anns/Cooper test in conjunction with Edwards v. the Law Society of Upper Canada.. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
The protestors made efforts to cooperate with the protesters to make sure that no laws were being broken. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
In a long expected finding, the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:06 am
Realize that this was written in 1992 long before the current economic downturn. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:38 am
A ruling in that case, Cargill v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:54 am
Before I get any further into this, do the Mac folks here think that iMovie would be the best vehicle to do what I’m thinking (v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:55 am
In Mileikowsky v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:10 am
Most judges are notoriously reluctant to conclude that any government attorney was so totally evil as to invoke the Hyde Amendment.Florida federal Judge Alan Gold, however, proved himself one of the rarest of the rare by his decision yesterday in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
They have broken the law, yes, but how long should those involved be criminally liable? [read post]
