Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 3081 - 3100 of 8,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2016, 3:55 am by Jack Kennedy
HMRC had also attempted to argue that the shares should, in fact, be treated as cash and taxed accordingly. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 8:35 am by Joy Waltemath
As for their FLSA claims, the appeals court found they received sufficient information about the tip credit to satisfy the statutory notice requirement (Schaefer v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Buried in the otherwise routine analysis is an interesting discovery ruling in which the district court abused its discretion.The case is Carter v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:41 am by Dean Freeman
The company’s U.S. headquarters is in Jupiter, FL and it employs some 611,000 people globally in prisons, airports, ports, cash transport services and more. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:23 am by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
The last few months have seen a spree of lawsuits filed against social media companies for allegedly providing material support to terrorists groups, particularly ISIS, by effectively allowing those groups to use their systems. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:46 am by Jon Hyman
The leading case on the issue of meal credits as FLSA wages is Herman v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
Surveillance video captured the perpetrator knocking over the cash register touch screen with his hand during the incident. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 1:59 pm
 If I tell you "Give me your car, I'll give it back to you tomorrow," all the time winking at you, but you know full well that I'm going to rob a bank with that car and actually return the car to you in a week -- with a bundle of cash from the bank robbery "accidentally" left in the back seat -- my view is that, sure, my statement to you was "false", but there was no actionable wire fraud, because my "lie" to you wasn't material:… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:38 am by Fred Wertheimer
The Supreme Court pointed to the routine actions that officeholders undertake for constituents in finding that the facts of McDonnell v. [read post]