Search for: "Crawford " Results 3081 - 3100 of 6,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 4:13 pm by Bridget Crawford
Crawford, Pace Panelists: Teemu Ruskola, Emory Amr Shalakhany, American University of Cairo (AUC) Lara Stemple, UCLA Commentator: Suzanne Goldberg, Columbia 12:00-1:00 LUNCH Conversation 3: Gender and the Establishment of Human Rights 1:00–2:15 Moderator: Katherine Franke, Columbia Panelists: Karen Engle, Texas Ratna Kapur, Geneva School of Diplomacy and International Relations (visiting Yale Law) Helen Kinsella, Wisconsin Sally Engle Merry, NYU Commentator: Tracy Higgins,… [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:27 am by Bridget Crawford
Crawford (Pace), bcrawford at law dot pace dot edu, and Kathy Stanchi (UNLV), kathryn dot stanchi at unlv dot edu. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:49 pm
In sum, the Court in Crawford rejected "reliable hearsay" as a substitute for the right of confrontation. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:21 pm by Patricia Salkin
Crawford on the permit that “damage to billboard exceeded 50% of structure”, and the Board’s findings “that the Billboard in question was totally destroyed” and “substantial rebuilding” would be necessary to satisfy Code section 70–17. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:57 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
"To the extent that Kritt is raising a Crawford challenge to the 18 USC 3505  certifications, the Court finds that such certificates are not contemplated by the Supreme Court in Crawford as inadmissible testimonial evidence. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 11:42 am
You can find one of the reply briefs (from the Democratic party) posted here. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:24 pm by Dan Filler
Just 48 hours ago, I was excited to let people know that Twinkies were back on the market as of this weekend. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:45 am
You can find the brief of the Indiana Democratic Party here. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:15 am
Whether documents were testimonial depended on whether the declarant realized she was talking to a government agent, in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
It appears that this recent announcement from the state Bureau of Motor Vehicles might have some bearing on the question. [read post]