Search for: "District of Columbia Government, Appeal of" Results 3081 - 3100 of 3,634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the lawsuit to enforce our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests regarding the government’s warrantless cell phone tracking practice. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:28 am
District Court for the District of Columbia granted part of Young's motion to reconsider a previous order that dismissed several of Young's allegations. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:29 am by arester
He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and in New York, as well as before the Court of International Trade, the District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 4:50 am by Steve Vladeck
District Court for the District of Columbia agree with that proposition more often than not. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am by Steven M. Taber
– Opinion, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, August 27, 2010 Preparing for the intermediate reduction in HCFC production in 2010 (the “2010 stepdown”), the EPA initiated a new rulemaking in late 2008. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Paul Tonko (D-NY) have introduced legislation into the Senate and House of Representatives intended to extend the HIRE Act, which was signed into law by President Obama on March 18, 2010, by six months.District of Columbia - D.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing, among other things, that “[t]he affirmative action requirements that OFCCP seeks to impose . . . are not enforceable against a party which had never agreed to such requirements and which had never agreed to do business with the federal government. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit requiring the government to obtain a warrant when it uses a GPS tracking device to monitor someone's movements. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:57 am by Kevin
Federal appeals court in District of Columbia finds that the use of a tracking device to monitor a suspect for a month without obtaining a warrant was an an unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:48 am
Aug. 6, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) failed adequately to explain the basis of, and failed to provide adequate support for, its approval of a proposed fee by NYSE Arca for access by investors to its proprietary “depth-of-book” product, Arcabook. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:33 am by William Morriss
In more positive news, the appeals court for the District of Columbia circuit has rejected a claim by the government that round the clock warrantless GPS surveillance is ok (article here). [read post]
A recent decision by the federal court of appeals in the District of Columbia suggests that, in certain circumstances, employers who track their employees’ location could face liability for invasion of privacy. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:19 am by Jennifer Varughese
Our immigration law attorneys represent clients in Manassas, Woodbridge, Stafford, Alexandria, Arlington, Fredericksburg, Falls Church, Fairfax and all of Northern Virginia, as well as throughout Maryland and the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:16 am by Sheppard Mullin
District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing, among other things, that “[t]he affirmative action requirements that OFCCP seeks to impose . . . are not enforceable against a party which had never agreed to such requirements and which had never agreed to do business with the federal government. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bridgeport case; recent case in Saregama (now on appeal) wrote a scathing rebuttal to Bridgeport’s infringement analysis. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided (PDF) that the Fourth Amendment requires the government to obtain a warrant when it uses a GPS tracking device to monitor someone's movements for an extended period of time. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm by zshapiro
The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Antoine Jones’ conviction for distribution of cocaine and cocaine base due to Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking of Jones’ vehicle without a search warrant. [read post]