Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3081 - 3100 of 4,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
 August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy  In B.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For Dryer, a 24- minute production, “Game of the Week 1969 Week #1 Vikings vs. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:43 pm by Jon L. Gelman
(A-40/41/42/43/44/45/46-18) (081810)Argued November 19, 2019 -- Decided June 3, 2020 ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.The Court considers whether defendants who manufacture or distribute products that, by their design, require the replacement of asbestos-containing components with other asbestos-containing components during the ordinary life of the product have a duty to give adequate warnings to the ultimate user.Plaintiff Arthur Whelan filed suit against the seven present defendants,… [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
No Private Benefit Provision of 501(c)(3) Museums While § 501(c)(3) does not specifically mention private benefits restrictions,[16] it is found in the Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), which prohibits an organization from operating “for the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private interests. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
When the term was first coined in 2013, there were 43 unicorns.[20] There are now roughly 1,205.[21] That is an increase of about 121 unicorns in less than one year since I last spoke on this topic. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
(p. 43) The question of jurisdiction is not, in fact, as clear as this quote suggests and I have looked at the matter in some detail here. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
For instance, California state law does not permit a sale of real property free and clear of liens. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:14 pm
Oklahoma (6.8, 3.8, SoS=76).The game takes place in Dallas, so the normal home field rule does not apply. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
It does not follow that the advice has to be accepted or followed nor for that matter, for the advice to be correct. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:43 am by Keith Rizzardi
Table 5: Statute under Which Case Was Brought, Amount Paid, and Number of Payments Paid by Treasury from the Judgment Fund on Behalf of Interior, March 2001 through September 2010 Statute under which case was brought a Attorney fees and costs # of payments Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1540 $21,298,971 b 238 Civil Rights Act Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16 1,243,194 38 Tucker Act (inverse condemnation & other claims), 28 U.S.C. 1491 … [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Title II does not create a right to information. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the authorities in the Requested State have decided not to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 11:46 am by Michael Lowe
“If the State does not adequately establish both probable cause and exigent circumstances, then a warrantless entry will not withstand judicial scrutiny. [read post]