Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3081 - 3100 of 4,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
Mulvaney Amendment 1: Attempts to protect civil libertiesThis amendment does three things. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:20 am by Mark Toth
(Blawg; SHRM) How frequently does our audience conduct surveys? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:57 am by Theo Francis
Hey, who wouldn’t take a 43% discount on private-plane flights if they could get it? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    Kevin’s comments suggest that he agrees with me on points 1, 2 and 5. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by Aeyal Gross
by Aeyal Gross [Aeyal Gross is a Professor at Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Law.] [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” International harmonization might help sell the idea of limiting §43(a) to false representations and not protecting unregistered marks; it’s not very doctrinally pure, though, and she’s grabbing at an available tool. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 7:10 pm
The requisite elements of proof in a medical malpractice action are (1) a deviation or departure from accepted practice, and (2) evidence that such departure was a proximate cause of injury or damage. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:44 am by Ronald Podolny
Mere foreseeability of a consequence does not satisfy the requirement of intention: [43] (Lord Hoffmann). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:58 pm
In the Taco Bell Salmonella outbreak in January 2012 the CDC announced that it was working with state and local health departments to investigate a Salmonella Enteritidis outbreak that had sickened 68 people in the following 10 states:  Texas (43 ill), Oklahoma (16), Kansas (2), Iowa (1), Michigan (1), Missouri (1), Nebraska (1), New Mexico (1), Ohio (1), and Tennessee (1). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:15 am by Mandelman
  I’d like your opinion on the following purely hypothetical scenario…   If a small group of individuals working within a nation’s government made a series of decisions that destroyed the economic security of tens of millions of the country’s citizens… decisions that literally cost thousands of lives, and in all likelihood shortened the life expectancies of hundreds of thousands more… failed to such a degree that it would be more than a decade before… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:24 am by Gilles Cuniberti
See also paragraph 43 of the von Overbeck report. [24] I am therefore persuaded that the Recognition of Trusts Act 1987 does not have the effect of making the law chosen by the settlor the governing law of the steps needed to create the trust. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The premise underlying the doctrine of mutual mistake is that "the agreement as expressed, in some material respect, does not represent the meeting of the minds of the parties". [read post]