Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3081 - 3100 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 3:20 pm
207/10Orifarm A/S and Orifarm Supply A/S v Merck & Co. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
   The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:48 am by Florian Mueller
In any event, I published an unofficial English translation of Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
The judge stated that counsel should be able to deal with at least some of these from their own notes. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
The judge stated that counsel should be able to deal with at least some of these from their own notes. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:45 pm
Amid a fervent verbal duel over English and American legal history, between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen G. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
There are federalism questions raised by states' attempts to use state law to restrict what Defense Distributed can post on the Internet in other states. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiraltyCourt Vacates Maritime Attachment for Failure To State Valid Maritime Claim Under English LawKulberg Finances Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am by Marissa Miller
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Frank Miniter argues that the Court should hold that warrantless GPS tracking is a violation of the Fourth Amendment in United States v. [read post]