Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 6,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd, [2010] EWHC 1829 (Ch) (July 23 2010). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:03 pm
” The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., on Behalf of Tommy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:41 am
TULRCA also requires employers to notify the Secretary of State of the proposal, via form HR1. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 4:51 pm
NPR (Rachel Treisman) reports: Two German states have outlawed public displays of the letter "Z," which has become synonymous with support for Russia's war in Ukraine. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:15 pm
The recent district court decision in Minnesota, Tri-Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm
In the United Kingdom this was memorialized in the Magna Carta—and then deepened during the course of the English civil war of the 17th century (through Coke, an important figure in colonial political jurisprudence) and naturalized among the English colonial population. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
” Eldred v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:07 pm
App. 3d at p. 950.); English v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
That broad consensus is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
The Fourth Circuit’s approach in IRAP v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
A two-week English course doesn’t turn a foreigner into an English-speaking American. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:00 pm
Reid v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
Carrington (1765), an English case well known to the Founders. [read post]
