Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 11,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 3:39 am
Supreme Court Home Office v Tariq [2011] UKSC 35 (13 July 2011) Al Rawi & Ors v The Security Service & Ors [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brighton and Hove City Council v PM & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 795 (12 July 2011) Pannone LLP v Aardvark Digital Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 803 (12 July 2011) Jones & Anor v Ruth & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 804 (12 July 2011) Shovelar & Ors v Lane & Ors… [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am
On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:41 am
Supreme Court's recent 5-4 decisionin Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:12 pm
" Judge Berzon, dissenting, begins her opinion this way: "The majority's peculiar interpretation of the word 'reasonableness' not only defies its common usage in the English language, but more importantly, runs contrary to what this court decided, sitting en banc, in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
(Halifax v HM Customs and Excise (C-255/02)) HMRC sought to recover VAT on the full sale price of the cars and charged penalties. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:05 pm
Blum v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:03 am
Plain English Issue: Does the government violate a federal contract employee’s constitutional right to privacy by asking her whether she has received counseling or treatment for recent illegal drug use in the past year, or by asking her references if they have any reason to believe she is unsuited to work in a federal facility? [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 10:46 am
In the English courts, a claimant may be ordered to pay funds into court as security for the defendant’s legal costs. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
For example, in Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
20 Sep 2006, 11:23 am
The 4th District Court of Appeal, in Basha v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:31 am
An ISP serving as a mere conduit would not incur liability for trade mark infringement under English law even in the absence of the safe harbour provisions. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:18 am
In the case of Kajima UK Engineering Limited v The Underwriter Insurance Company Limited [2008] EWHC 83 (TCC), the Technology and Construction division of the High Court considered the ambit of a notification provision in a "claims made" policy. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
While the G2/21 status quo may start to crystallize in Dutch case law, this raises a question – in view of e.g. the pending Fibrogen v Akabia UK SC appeal – for the English court: Quo vadis? [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:16 am
His Honour Judge Hacon handed down judgment in AutoStore v Ocado on 30 March 2023. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:04 pm
How in English translation Våffeldagen became to be called "International" is unclear, and in any event it's a misnomer: American contrarians have declared August 24 -- the date in 1839 when a patent for the waffle iron issued -- to be Waffle Day in the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
Mr Justice Gillen’s judgment in the case of Lee, Morrison and X v News Group Newspapers ([2010] NIQB 106) has now been made public. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
For example, in Williams v Bayley 1 HL 200 a son forged his father’s signature to obtain promissory notes from a bank. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
The majority in Khuja held that this statement was confined to describing the basis on which English law permits the pre-trial identification of persons charged with offences. [read post]
