Search for: "FOX v. STATE"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 3,154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2007, 8:31 pm
The resentment state judges felt at the then-recent federal takeover can still be heard:The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence cannot be interposed solely to provide a tidy "fox hunting" theory of criminal justice. ...We agree with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals when it stated that it cannot believe that the "Supreme Court has forbidden the police to investigate crime. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 2:19 pm
Hatch argues, among other points, that a decision of the United States Supreme Court, Reno v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 5:11 pm
Circuit claiming that the "open platforms for devices and applications" portions of the auction rules (the "no locking, no blocking" rules): exceed the Commission's authority under the Communications Actviolate the United States Constitutionviolate the Administrative Procedure Actand are arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence and otherwise contrary to law.Just as a guess, I'd say that VZ Wireless intends to claim that, as in Fox… [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
Younger v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 3:25 pm
See Fox v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 7:37 pm
See the Lenz v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:30 am
Exhibit A in that regard is Riches v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:20 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Employment Complaint Against Individual Defendants in Official Capacities Dismissed; New York Is Party in Interest Fox v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's landmark Brown v. [read post]
Ind. Decisions - Yet more on: Impact of Fort Wayne Disability Center ruling in other areas of state?
5 Aug 2007, 3:54 pm
Rick Fox, Floyd County attorney, also said he believes professional-services contracts are exempt from bidding. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:52 am
Fox, 2007 WL 2231389).] [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 10:05 am
Fox v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 4:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:35 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
Our Chief Justice was making (v. earning) $107,600 per annum and will now be paid $128,556. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:20 am
The problem is that the Supreme Court of the United States saw fit to condone this type of warrantless intrusion known as a sobriety check in the 1992 case of Michigan v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 7:57 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003). [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 12:07 am
There seems to be little else in the recent cases cited by Mr Fox to assist in this inquiry. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:21 am
See also United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
Gotta love how Fox News prides itself in reporting real news. [read post]
