Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 3081 - 3100 of 15,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2009, 4:20 am
The IPKat reports on Daimler v Sany [2009] EWHC 1003 (Ch), a request for summary judgment, which was refused on 14 May by Mr Geoffrey Hobbs QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court judge.Daimler sued Sany for trade mark infringement, claiming that Sany's device mark caused confusion with and took unfair advantage of, or caused detriment to the well-known Mercedes Benz figurative mark. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Over at the Federalist Society’s new blog, SCOTUSreport.com, Steven Teles has a very interesting post on the Chief Justice’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendations in Tsaganea v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 1:32 am by INFORRM
But the law is also clear that public figures still enjoy a right to privacy, as successful litigants such as Naomi Campbell and “PJS” demonstrate. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Kevin
– Jag beklagar verkligen saken och hoppas att pengarna i alla fall används till vården genom statskassan, säger han till Nyan. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:23 am by Marcel Pemsel
The applicant relied on the AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (case C‑541/18, IPKat here). [read post]