Search for: "Foster v. US" Results 3081 - 3100 of 3,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
Supreme Court ruled that the race-conscious admissions programs used by Harvard College and University of North Carolina (UNC) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, effectively striking down the use of affirmative action programs for college and university admissions across the country (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
   His goal – which I share – is to foster a genuinely pluralistic left, capable of sympathetic – or teeth-gritting – cohabitation with religious minorities, and to frame and justify a rule permitting narrow and burdened exemptions. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:16 am
    One case that has received considerable recent attention and commentary is Stengart v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am by Eric Goldman
Overturning Tiffany v. eBay In 2010, the Second Circuit issued a watershed decision about secondary trademark infringement. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
They may live in foster homes or even with friends or neighbours. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Steven Boutwell
The purpose of protecting trade secrets is to foster innovation and countries in all corners of the globe recognize the critical role trade secrets play in creating incentives for innovative efforts in a variety of fields. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
  My hope is that this exercise will provide an incentive to dig deep into both primary and secondary sources in a  useful way. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Steve Lubet
Review of Law & Social Change will not be used to implement the academic boycott of Israel. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]