Search for: "G. A. " Results 3081 - 3100 of 65,543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 8:23 am by Apostolos Anthimos
., on subsidiary jurisdiction under Regulation 650/2012 (comment by G. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
G 2/21 The Court of Appeal provided some interesting obiter observations on the EBA’s decision in G 2/21: First, Lord Justice Arnold opined that the majority approach in Warner-Lambert corresponds to the “ab initio plausibility” test identified in the referral decision underlying G 2/21 (T 116/18 Sumitomo), whereas that of the minority corresponds to the “ab initio implausibility” test. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For one thing, any new regulatory issuer-size trigger for periodic disclosures would seem to impermissibly end-run the statutory issuer-size triggers that Congress wrote into Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
App. 3d 15, 28–29 (1st Dist. 2003), as modified on denial of reh’g (Nov. 10, 2003) recognized, a lawyer may not “escap[e] liability for knowingly and substantially assisting a client in the commission of a tort. [read post]
9 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Chijioke Okorie reported on a judgment issued by the Nigerian Trade Mark Tribunal which concerned the registrability of movie and character titles as trade marks.Patents Rose Hugues shared some thoughts on the decision in G 2/21 issued by the Enlarged Board of Appeal on the standard of evidence required for inventive step. [read post]
9 May 2023, 11:28 am
SeLegue of Arnold & Porter, San Francisco, Treasurer; and ·         Benjamin G. [read post]
9 May 2023, 11:11 am by Kendra Hutchinson
May 3, 2023) (summary order), an 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) felon-in-possession trial, prosecutors described the facts of the case in vivid detail that emphasized the dangers posed to the public and bystanders. [read post]
9 May 2023, 10:57 am by Ione Deda Alves
Contexte Le litige entre les parties découle de l’ajout, suite à des négociations précédant la signature de la convention collective, d’une clause prévoyant que les salariés âgés de 71 ans et plus et recevant une rente de retraite verraient leur traitement salarial diminué de l’équivalent de la moitié de leur rente de retraite. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:51 am by Rose Hughes
 the parties rely on the same kind of hardware and software as were available at the time of G 1/21, i.e. the picture and sound quality is basically the same. [read post]